Did You See That

Unless you have been living on another planet, you can’t have escaped the furore surrounding Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand. Yes, I think they were wrong but what a feeding frenzy over what wasn’t really that big a deal and should have not been aired by the producers. Radio 2 presenters have been giving their reaction and a devastated looking Jeremy Vine says he says he will be interested to see how Jonathan Ross can come back from this - with his tone inferring that he shoudn’t - and saying he hopes Ross has apologised to the now ex-controller on whose watch this happened.

An edgy comedian pushing the limits sometimes needs to be reined in but I don’t think that in itself damages the BBC’s credibility. What does do enormous damage to the BBC’s credibility is when serious programming - such as the Election night coverage - reduced to an absolute joke by Jeremy Vine and the computer graphics department with cringemaking displays that embarrass us all. So on the topic of apologising, Mr Vine, how about you say sorry for making the once might Beeb look absurd with your awful election night performance?

Just in case you missed it…

Ok, I’m going to take a break from my usual ponderings on reality shows and soaps to discuss tonight’s Question Time special, in advance of the London elections next week.

Boris Johnson, despite being famed for his TV appearances, has seemed to struggle in the televised debates so far. But with tonight’s QT being probably the final big set piece debate, he saved the best for last. He made his point well, and was sharp and punchy in laying into the Mayor’s record. He maintained a seriousness throughout which defied his critics, whilst still managing enough colourful flourishes of language to remind you what a great character he is.

Ken Livingstone looked to me like a beaten man. His head was down and went through the motions with a few quips, but he was on the backfoot for much of the debate although he warmed up a bit towards the end. Although the debate between the two was strong and occasionally barbed, you could also sense some mutual respect and they left the stage arm in arm, such was their bonhomie!

Their generally good natured debate was occasionally punctured though by the malevolant presence of the Lib Dem candidate, Brian Paddick. For a start I’d have to question why he even gets invited along to all these televised debates. His share in the opinion polls is a long way behind the main two - he clearly won’t be the next Mayor - so why does he warrant a place on the debate any more than UKIP or the Christian Choice! But far from be grateful for his unjustified slot on national TV, he instead reeked of arrogance. He also took the debate to new lows when the question of morals came up and he said that Boris’ family couldn’t trust him. It was a horrific cheap shot and there an audible groan from the audience. Brian presents himself as a man of impeccable morals - presumably his ex wife knew he was gay when they got married then? I don’t think Paddick did himself any favours with his mean spirited bitchiness.

My own view, for what it’s worth, is that Ken himself often comes across as likeable and, yes, even competent but I don’t think it can be disputed that he and his supporters have used the politics of division in London and I hate to see that approach prosper. It is surely time for a change. I think Boris Johnson is just the new broom that London needs, hopefully bringing in a new style.

Did you see the debate? What did you think?